| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Can you use traditional Technical Analysis on Eve Charts - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: trianna Ekanon Not a hobbyist, an actual professional. Short answer, more or less. Eve has an incredibly rudimentary trade system, which is still light years beyond other mmos but painfully limited compared to rl trading...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2011.07.27 13:21:00
|
2. One Stop Financial Statements - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I'm going on a Finance for Non-financial managers course in a couple of weeks run by the IOD as part of their certificate / diploma program. I intend to bring this along for discussion :) Would it be possible to get a copy of the underlying exce...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2010.06.17 00:40:00
|
3. How many people would kill me if... - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Dr Slaughter on 26/10/2007 08:52:43 ok.. so I didn't read the second page when I wrote... this... If something is guaranteed and the guarantee can't be met out of the businesses normal operating budget, for whatever reason, shoul...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.10.26 08:51:00
|
4. Exporting Market History Graphs? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
you could intercept the data passed to the third party graphing library.. no wait.. that would get you banned. :( Seriously though it would be great if CCP did allow us to dump the historical graph data.
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.09.13 20:36:00
|
5. Streaming video interview with the Good Doctor EyjoG - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Coconut Joe It's a shame that the interviewer was such a plank, there are all sorts of questions that could have been asked and all we got was nothing new. Oh well, at least I know what he looks like now. Why not start a ...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.09.13 20:19:00
|
6. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
The post is here for those interested. Feel free to add your own comments/improvements there.
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.10 16:00:00
|
7. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
The post is here for those interested. Feel free to add your own comments/improvements there.
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.10 16:00:00
|
8. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Montaire Sorry, I might have communicated the idea poorly. The game designers intended Trust to be a commodity. They want that just one person can, if given roles, sabotage a corp. You say in your first post "In the light ...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.10 12:24:00
|
9. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Montaire Spy is a valid profession choice in EVE. and thus my idea is a bad one? Not sure I understand you point.
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.10 02:18:00
|
10. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: solidshot The change i want to see is that when a station is conquered all the former members assets within that station drop into the conquering forces hangers. and I would like a 'scuttle' option for the outpost manager...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.10 01:35:00
|
11. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Montaire The "roles" system already gives people plenty of ways to regulate that. No set of tools will stop a spy, or an idiot director for that matter. In this case, ISS sufered from the both. Well, actually, requiring a...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.08 05:40:00
|
12. Improved protection for high asset value items - in Market Discussions [original thread]
In the light of the recent POS situation ISS suffered I was wondering if you think CCP should be looking at improving the tools alliances and corporations can use to control how high value assets are accessed and used. Specifically I've suggested ...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.08 03:08:00
|
13. To the shareholders of ISS - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: kublai Originally by: Dr Slaughter Originally by: kublai I'll judge ISS on the security they provide my ISK with, considering members have offered to sell your stations for 1.5billion pr station (re: goons be...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 06:58:00
|
14. To the shareholders of ISS - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: kublai I'll judge ISS on the security they provide my ISK with, considering members have offered to sell your stations for 1.5billion pr station (re: goons being offered pos offlining),I am NOT confident the investors isk is...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 06:41:00
|
15. ISS Alliance open to investors - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: WhiskeyDP -stuff- i have fully respect for what iss have accomplished and i have done lots of business with them in the past but no matter how much scamming is allowed by ccp it doesnt go very well with having a "public pers...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 06:37:00
|
16. To the shareholders of ISS - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: kublai -stuff- To be honest, looks like ISS failed big time already, you were supposedly a neutral corporation, and this was to be your sa***uard ( don't mention that joke of a "navy" you're a part of, you can't sa***uard f...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 06:26:00
|
17. To the shareholders of ISS - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Dark Shikari So when the coalition breaks up and the bandwagon stops, will ISS go hire MC and try to take back at least some of the stations? Or will they decide "oh we're going to become an empire trading corp!11!1!"? I...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 04:27:00
|
18. To the shareholders of ISS - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: kublai Originally by: Dr Slaughter Originally by: Dark Shikari So all your previous shareholders don't matter? Perhaps that was the point of the ISSO IPO. Create an IPO so big that ISS can ignore their previ...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 03:15:00
|
19. To the shareholders of ISS - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Dark Shikari So all your previous shareholders don't matter? Perhaps that was the point of the ISSO IPO. Create an IPO so big that ISS can ignore their previous investors. Don't be so banal. Why the hell do you think I jo...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 03:00:00
|
20. Are the Space Barbarians Winning? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Dr Slaughter on 07/01/2007 02:48:59 The barbarians are definitely at the gates from where IĈm sat and the sheer amount of vitriol and invective against ISS on the forums is simply staggering. The concept of building a robust econom...
- by Dr Slaughter - at 2007.01.07 02:39:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |